Back
100s
LSAT Reading Comprehension Comparative Reading Easy Practice Question

Free access limit is ending soon

Upgrade to unlock all Comparative Reading questions.

View Plans
Learn + Solve: Shortcut, Trap & Fast Route Click to view shortcut, steps, and common mistake
Learn + solve

Solve this faster with the right shortcut first

Shortcut used: Summarize Passage A and Passage B separately, mark agreement and disagreement, then test every option against both passages. Reject any choice that overstates either author's claim.
Solve in 3 steps:
  1. Check whether it is grammar, vocabulary, or comprehension.
  2. Apply the matching rule or locate the evidence line.
  3. Reject options that sound natural but break the rule or evidence.
Common mistake: Do not choose only by sound; confirm the grammar rule or passage evidence.
Question 5 Multiple Choice Question
Question
PAIR 2 — HUMANITIES AND MUSEUM REPLICAS Passage A High-fidelity replicas can teach visitors about an artwork's shape and imagery, but museums should not present replicas as equivalent substitutes for originals. An original bears physical traces of its production and history: the artist's corrections, the material's aging, and even damage caused by earlier display practices. These features are not decorative accidents; they are evidence. Standing before the original also places a viewer in contact with the same object that moved through particular hands and institutions. Digital scans and facsimiles may widen access, especially when travel is impossible, yet their educational value depends on candid labeling and explanation of what has been lost. A museum that replaces difficult-to-display originals without acknowledging the difference risks turning historical objects into detachable images. Passage B Museums have often treated direct contact with an original as the highest form of access, but that standard can exclude most of the public. Fragile works remain in storage, distant collections are expensive to visit, and crowded galleries permit only brief viewing. Carefully documented replicas can reveal details through enlargement, lighting, and side-by-side comparison that the original display cannot provide. The relevant question is not whether a replica possesses the original's entire history; clearly it does not. The question is whether a particular learning goal requires that history. For studying composition, reconstructing a damaged site, or allowing tactile exploration, a replica may be the better instrument. Museums should identify replicas plainly while judging them by the knowledge they enable rather than by an automatic hierarchy of authenticity. QUESTION 5: The central disagreement between the passages concerns whether
Prev Next
Back to Topic
LSAT Reading Comprehension Comparative Reading
100s
Question 5
Easy Marks: 1.0 Practice Question

Free access limit is ending soon

Upgrade to unlock all Comparative Reading questions.

View Plans
Learn + Solve: Shortcut, Trap & Fast Route Click to view shortcut, steps, and common mistake
Learn + solve

Shortcut used, common trap, and the fastest solving route

Shortcut used: Summarize Passage A and Passage B separately, mark agreement and disagreement, then test every option against both passages. Reject any choice that overstates either author's claim.
Solve in 3 steps:
  1. Check whether it is grammar, vocabulary, or comprehension.
  2. Apply the matching rule or locate the evidence line.
  3. Reject options that sound natural but break the rule or evidence.
Common mistake: Do not choose only by sound; confirm the grammar rule or passage evidence.
Question

PAIR 2 — HUMANITIES AND MUSEUM REPLICAS Passage A High-fidelity replicas can teach visitors about an artwork's shape and imagery, but museums should not present replicas as equivalent substitutes for originals. An original bears physical traces of its production and history: the artist's corrections, the material's aging, and even damage caused by earlier display practices. These features are not decorative accidents; they are evidence. Standing before the original also places a viewer in contact with the same object that moved through particular hands and institutions. Digital scans and facsimiles may widen access, especially when travel is impossible, yet their educational value depends on candid labeling and explanation of what has been lost. A museum that replaces difficult-to-display originals without acknowledging the difference risks turning historical objects into detachable images. Passage B Museums have often treated direct contact with an original as the highest form of access, but that standard can exclude most of the public. Fragile works remain in storage, distant collections are expensive to visit, and crowded galleries permit only brief viewing. Carefully documented replicas can reveal details through enlargement, lighting, and side-by-side comparison that the original display cannot provide. The relevant question is not whether a replica possesses the original's entire history; clearly it does not. The question is whether a particular learning goal requires that history. For studying composition, reconstructing a damaged site, or allowing tactile exploration, a replica may be the better instrument. Museums should identify replicas plainly while judging them by the knowledge they enable rather than by an automatic hierarchy of authenticity. QUESTION 5: The central disagreement between the passages concerns whether

Keep Practicing This Pattern

Topic Recommendations

Recommended Next Practice

Use these suggestions after solving the practice questions above.

Practice Similar Questions
Concept tagged
Summarize Passage A and Passage B separately mark agreement and disagreement

Related Topics